AI Takes the Reins: Can Robots Really Conduct Surveys?

The Rise of the Robotic Interviewer

Imagine a world where surveys are conducted not by humans, but by AI. This isn’t science fiction anymore. Researchers at VKL Research, Inc., in collaboration with SSRS, have developed an AI system capable of conducting complex, quantitative telephone surveys. Their work, recently presented at the 2025 American Association of Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) Conference, challenges our assumptions about data collection and the future of market research.

How the AI Works

This isn’t your grandpappy’s automated phone system. This AI interviewer leverages cutting-edge technology: large language models (LLMs) for understanding and generating natural-sounding speech, automatic speech recognition (ASR) to transcribe responses in real-time, and speech synthesis to vocalize questions and feedback. It’s a sophisticated system designed to adhere strictly to best practices in quantitative research, meticulously randomizing question and answer order to avoid bias.

The system isn’t just reading from a script. It can interpret nuanced responses, handle interruptions, and even manage ambiguous answers with surprising dexterity. Think of it as a highly skilled interviewer who never gets tired, never misreads a response, and never misses a call.

Testing the AI: A Real-World Experiment

To validate their creation, the researchers conducted two pilot surveys using the SSRS Opinion Panel, a nationally representative sample of US adults. The first wave served as a test run, while the second incorporated refinements based on the initial findings. The second wave included a clever twist: half the participants received a shorter survey (46 questions), while the other half tackled a longer version (123 questions).

The Results: Successes and Surprises

The results were striking. In the second wave, despite the significant length of the surveys, a remarkable 43% completion rate was achieved. Even more impressive was the 59% rate of participants who completed at least one question after picking up the phone. But the most interesting finding wasn’t the raw completion rate. It was the unexpected effect of survey length.

While in-survey feedback showed similar satisfaction levels between the short and long surveys, the follow-up interviews revealed a clear trend. Participants who completed the shorter survey were significantly more likely to report a positive experience, highlighting the importance of keeping the interaction concise and efficient, even with an AI. This suggests that even though the technology was identical, the shorter survey’s brevity led to a better perceived user experience.

Improvements in the AI itself between waves also had a noticeable effect. Addressing issues like misinterpretations of answers and technical glitches significantly boosted completion rates and respondent satisfaction. This underscores the ongoing need for iterative development and refinement of this technology.

Strengths of AI Interviewing: Beyond Automation

This technology offers some compelling advantages over traditional methods. The AI’s ability to handle interruptions, navigate noisy environments, and understand nuanced language surpasses the capabilities of older automated systems. It can even gently probe for more information when respondents offer vague answers — a level of sophistication usually associated with skilled human interviewers.

Challenges: The Limits of Perfection

Despite these advancements, challenges remain. Automatic speech recognition, while advanced, isn’t perfect. Errors in transcription can disrupt the flow of conversation, frustrating participants and potentially impacting data accuracy. Researchers also highlight the need to strike a delicate balance between ensuring standardization (to maintain data integrity) and flexibility (to create a natural-sounding conversation).

Another interesting observation was the potential for “straightlining” — when respondents give the same answer to every question without actually paying attention. This highlights the need to incorporate safeguards within the AI system to detect and address this type of respondent misbehavior.

The Future of AI in Surveys: A Glimpse Ahead

The researchers suggest several areas for future study, including larger-scale validation, a deeper dive into respondent demographics and preferences, and the potential application of AI interviewers in inbound surveying scenarios. Understanding how different demographics interact with the technology and whether AI-enabled interviews effectively capture underrepresented groups will be crucial for widespread adoption.

The implications of this research are profound. AI-powered survey technology offers the potential for faster, cheaper, and potentially more accurate data collection. It could open up exciting possibilities for researchers and market analysts alike, enabling large-scale studies with greater efficiency and reduced costs. However, careful consideration of the ethical and methodological implications will be crucial as this technology matures.

The study, conducted by Danny D. Leybzon, Shreyas Tirumala, and Nishant Jain of VKL Research, Inc., and colleagues at SSRS, demonstrates a significant leap forward. It’s not just about replacing humans with robots. It’s about harnessing the power of AI to improve the accuracy, efficiency, and ultimately the quality of our understanding of the world around us.